I recently came across this post by Bill Easum (Bill Easum's Post) on the top 6 tactical mistakes a chruch can make. I thought I would share my responses in hope you might join the conversation. Please go and read his post first so that you can get his opinions unfiltered.
Now granted, I cannot match the years of experience and expertise Bill has and won't attempt to compete with his observations by making ones of my one. They are what they are. But I feel the need to ask, "Is this true?" or "Does this make sense in my experience, limited thought it may be?"
So off we go...
Mistake 1: Amen! I'm glad to hear this expressed beyond our Evangelism and Church Growth Office in Louisville. We have this discussion daily. In my opinion, if the church can bring evangelism and social justice back together, then the church can start being the church again. However, I think the emergent conversation is broader and more complicated then the issues of evangelism and social justice. Ecclesiology has a big part of that conversation as well.
Mistake 2: I completely agree and would add that it not only has the potential to fail to get the worship service off to a energetic beginning but can and does alienate visitors. The same goes for prolonged sharing of joys and concerns. I have long encouraged open sharing of joys and concerns, but care must be taken not to allow it to be so prolonged and in depth that those who are new may disconnect.
Mistake 3: Looking back on the church plant I started, I wish I had hired a worship leader first. Instead we hired a Director of Christian Education. Not a horrible call but certainly our worship experience, which was one of the first glimpses a new person got of our new faith community, could have been greatly enhanced by a hired worship leader. I don't agree that it should be the first hire in every new church or growing church looking to expand staff. So much of church planting and church growth is contextual. i think it's an over-generalization to declare "one size fits all." Each church should look at it's ministry and determine for itself which first hire it. Where one church may need a music leader, another may need a social worker, volunteer coordinator, etc. Hire who you need to hire to be the church (and reach the ones) God has called you to be (and reach).
Mistake 4: Hmmm. I have wrestled with this often. I would need to know if Bill means a personal, face to face visit, phone call, or email. (All this is assuming they leave their contact information...those first time visitors are well aware of our tactics and may choose to remain anonymous!) First, email doesn't seem too personal. Although it would work for me (as a first time visitor), others may find it too impersonal. I think much of that depends on the age of the person and their church experience. So I'm guessing it's one of the first two. Of those, I would humbly suggest that a well timed phone call would be best to "feel out" whether or not they might receptive to a visit. Here's where it pays to know your community. For an unchurched person, having the pastor show up to visit might be unwelcome whereas someone having grown up in the church might fully expect the pastor to show and if that does not happen, they feel unwelcome. So, are you dealing with mostly unchurched people? Maybe most families are dual income and spend their days working and their evenings shuttling kids to and fro while trying to get dinner ready. Is it a retirement community where there is potentially more time for face to face interaction? Finally what expectations do you create when the Pastor is the first to show up? How will that impact how you do pastoral care and future interactions? These are not light questions especially for a growing, vital church.
Mistake 5: I would be interested in know how he came to this conclusion. While this may be true, I would want a staff that can do what needs to be done regardless of their 'specialty." Maybe this a "jack of all trades, master of none" conversation. I remember a football coach encouraging me to quit band and focus on athletics because "while I could be good at both, i could only be great at one." I disagreed. I would suggest that volunteers need to be focused and specific. I fear that such specialized staff might slip into creating "kingdoms" unto themselves over and against the vision and direction of the church. The more investment staff have in the interconnectedness of the whole ministry and their role in making that happen, the more fully the vision will be pursued. My $.02.
Mistake 6: That's certainly possible but if that were the case, let's set the retirement age at 40. The problem may be more about the relational skills of our pastors than their age. For the majority of my response here, I would echo what I said about knowing your community and who you are trying to reach. That's probably more important than a general age of the person visiting new people.
So, What's your take?

All this assumes a traditional church. Our evangelism needs to move more to starting new communities that are first relational to the community around them, then meet the needs of that community. This will mostly NOT be with worship services, or bible studies or Sunday school, but with counseling, job placements, food banks, housing support, immigration issues support, environmental stewardship, recreation, evening gathering places other than bars, etc.
Only after developing relationships and long term trust can you begin to enter into conversations on why you are doing all of this in the first place. Then the top six issues above are all moot.
Posted by: Bob Pearson | August 24, 2009 at 05:42 PM
As for Mistake #1 - In my experience as Consultant for Congregational Transformation for Detroit Presbytery, our existing stable and declining congregations really have no idea how to blend evangelism with social justice/witness. We have a lot of work to do to help leaders in congregations see the big picture (envison an opportunity) where they might engage the community around them in social action while expressing their faith not only in action but in words! There is truly a duality here...we talk about our faith during worship and education hour and "do" our faith in social action projects. This is difficult, but necessary to change. Pastors and worship/teaching leaders must help individuals create and use real words/dialogue to express their faith to others...we really have yet to learn this skill.
Posted by: Karen Ferguson Carl | September 02, 2009 at 09:52 AM
Karen has a point. Without words, we are just a non-profit doing good works.
Read more here http://www.evangelismcoach.org/2008/is-neighborhood-outreach-evangelism
Re: Mistake #2. Announcements are insider stuff. Even video announcements are not working if one doesn't know who to talk to afterwords. "See Bob and Mary" doesn't work if I don't know what Bob and Mary even look like.
Finally, I do think Easum is right in his observations all the way around for the traditional church. House churches are a different animal.
Chris W
http://www.evangelismcoach.org
Posted by: twitter.com/EvangelismCoach | September 16, 2009 at 03:06 PM
Did you know that the Bible is the world's ultimate all time number one best seller - there have been more copies produced than any other book in history.
We believe that the Bible is an amazing and unusual book. We believe the Bible was written by humans but that God made sure they wrote what he wanted. Below are some reasons why we think everyone should trust what is written in it.
Posted by: buy viagra | March 18, 2010 at 10:35 AM
Elderly people deserve a quality of life in old age. They have been people who have forged this effort and dedication we are living today. We offer the best of us and restore all the good they have done for our country
Posted by: Costa Rica 4 retirement | April 27, 2010 at 11:48 AM
A good aritcle is the best of friends,the same today and forever.
Posted by: new jordans | November 09, 2010 at 10:11 PM